Solutions for real New Zealand visa problems

Section 61 is used when an applicant becomes unlawful or overstays. INZ checks personal history, intent, ties to New Zealand, and the reason the unlawful status occurred. A credible explanation and consistent evidence are essential to avoid dismissal of the request.

A PPI letter shows INZ has serious concerns about credibility, relationship authenticity, employment correctness or documentation reliability. A structured reply with verified facts, dates and supporting evidence is crucial to avoid refusal.

​

INZ checks attendance, academic performance, funding authenticity, course changes and genuine student intent. If conditions were breached, explanations must be factual, consistent and supported with documents.

​

Most refusals relate to weak ties, unclear travel purpose, unstable income or concerns about returning home. A credible explanation supported by strong ties and financial documents is required to reapply successfully.

INZ assesses intent to comply with visa conditions, travel purpose, financial capacity and past immigration history. Any inconsistency can trigger refusal or PPI. A credible narrative and supporting documents are required.

​

INZ reviews shared living, communication patterns, financial support, family awareness, travel history and long-term commitment. Missing joint bills or no rental agreement does not automatically cause refusal, but the evidence must be consistent and credible across all documents.

Most AEWV issues come from duty mismatch with ANZSCO, incorrect pay, accreditation problems, unclear job descriptions or inconsistencies between the employment agreement and job check. These must match INZ verification procedures to avoid delays or PPI.

Tell us the key facts and we will point you to the right page.

​

​

​